United for Profits
  • Personal Finance
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Strategy
  • Business
  • Retirement
  • Personal Finance
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Strategy
  • Business
  • Retirement
No Result
View All Result
United for Profits
No Result
View All Result
Home Personal Finance

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by
August 2, 2024
in Personal Finance
0
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS
Previous Post

Research Firm Predicts Bullish Bitcoin Breakout For Q4: 4 Key Reasons

Next Post

Fox’s Tucker Carlson Drops Bombshell: Did The CIA Create Bitcoin?

Next Post
Fox’s Tucker Carlson Drops Bombshell: Did The CIA Create Bitcoin?

Fox’s Tucker Carlson Drops Bombshell: Did The CIA Create Bitcoin?

Exchange Rate

Exchange Rate USD: Thu, 15 May.

Enter Your Information Below To Receive Trading Ideas and Latest News

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Copyright © 2025 unitedforprofits.com All Rights Reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Personal Finance
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Strategy
    • Business
    • Retirement

    Copyright © 2025 unitedforprofits.com All Rights Reserved.